Samurai and Viking Underpowered?



  • Hello everybody!
    I have not played a lot yet, but from what i have seen, there is no advantage in using a viking or a samurai over a knight. The knight has a better ranged weapon, almost the same speed, more HP and much better melee weapons.
    As for the other classes, I think they have different roles, and are balanced (pirate for ranged play, spartan as a javelin guy and ninja as the “man at arms”).
    I may be wrong, so plz let me know what you think.
    =)



  • Maybe listen to the comments from this person

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … gXhbtAaCIU



  • Vikings might e a bit, I do beleive that they’ll get a bit more OP once people learn how to use their throws properly.



  • Hammer throws kill a knight in two hits. And not hard to aim either.

    And Viking can become a roflcopter of doom in a large FFA game.



  • I just think knights are too strong at the moment. They can take 5 hits of a samurai, and do more damage than him. The speed and range aren’t bad too. Also the crosbow is insanely effective. Seems to onehit most factions.



  • @HammelGammel:

    I just think knights are too strong at the moment. They can take 5 hits of a samurai, and do more damage than him. The speed and range aren’t bad too. Also the crosbow is insanely effective. Seems to onehit most factions.

    Only one hits ninja in the chest.


Log in to reply