Ideaologies



  • @gregcau:

    Greek

    reference: http://html.rincondelvago.com/sexual-ideology.html

    Is anyone really surprised?



  • @lemonater47:

    Hell every American on the Internet I spoke to hated liberals. Even through America was founded on liberalism and were actually quite liberal themselves.

    New Zealand is out of the red and into the black and only gonna get further into the black. There’s a light money going around the government doesn’t know what to do with it. Australia on the other hand is $50 billion in the red. All those people who moved to Australia are feeling like right monkeys. They can’t even get citizenship very easy.

    More houses, lower living costs, better natural disaster protection and fibre for everyone is the concern of the every day New Zealander. ideology wise we don’t care as much. We have a whole government with executive power not one man. Agovernment that’s often a coalition of parties each with their own ideas.

    No one is really left wing right wing. Its who’s got the better offers come elections.

    ^ so unique…. But no, really you’ve never spoken to a Northerner before. We’re either conservative and sophisticated, or liberal and still pretty much sophisticated. It’s a lot to do with culture and how you were raised as far as social issues go, but most Northern republicans are actually more inclined to agree with democrats than their own leaders. It’s sad that countries try to use the South to label America these days. Sorry for that comment, but in all honesty using a small minority of uneducated slobs to judge an entire Country is a bit ridiculous. Not all southerners are like that, specially some of my friends from Austin



  • wth? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7Qz640OeM
    have you been smoking the green tea leafs again huggy bear?



  • @loin:

    wth? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7Qz640OeM
    have you been smoking the green tea leafs again huggy bear?

    Yesssssir, yuropean socialists need to 1v1 me in economist smackdown bruh



  • and how you were razed

    I was razed when I was only 5 years old. I got the scar on my butt to prove it.

    Every time I pooped it stun my butt for 3 years before it finally healed.



  • @Flippy:

    I was razed when I was only 5 years old. I got the scar on my butt to prove it.

    Every time I pooped it stun my butt for 3 years before it finally healed.

    Why aren’t you confident in your libertarianism dude. What, do you need to side step the issue by pointing out miniscule mistakes?



  • I would say anarchist, or something along these lines.



  • Anarchy could only work in a world of infinite space, and nearly unlimited economic opportunity. Basic,crude human urges and desires might make biological sense further back in our species history (lust, ambition and greed,) but in a situation with any observable population density such base urges must be moderated, that’s where laws come in. The higher population density the greater the need for laws and regulations. Anarchy today would turn into total chaos and insecurity. Not everyone is going to behave because there will always be greedy, lustful, jealous, unruly people. When we were disperse, small bands of hunter gatherers such people were in less contact with other people, likely only in contact with blood relations within their tribe or band. So on a small scale, it could totally work, on a large scale? Nope. Also we would be living primitive lives, how much advancement can we get done with a group of 20 or so people? Laws and regulations are the only way to rule a large scale society, and a large scale society is the only effective society.

    /idiotic post



  • @Huggles:

    Anarchy could only work in a world of infinite space, and nearly unlimited economic opportunity. Basic,crude human urges and desires might make biological sense further back in our species history (lust, ambition and greed,) but in a situation with any observable population density such base urges must be moderated, that’s where laws come in. The higher population density the greater the need for laws and regulations. Anarchy today would turn into total chaos and insecurity. Not everyone is going to behave because there will always be greedy, lustful, jealous, unruly people. When we were disperse, small bands of hunter gatherers such people were in less contact with other people, likely only in contact with blood relations within their tribe or band. So on a small scale, it could totally work, on a large scale? Nope. Also we would be living primitive lives, how much advancement can we get done with a group of 20 or so people? Laws and regulations are the only way to rule a large scale society, and a large scale society is the only effective society.

    /idiotic post

    But dude… Anarchism is not the lack of laws, modern anarchism comes from the proletarian theory and is mostly about abolishing the class divided society and so, abolish work exploitation and shit like that. Have you EVER read anything from the proletarian theory?
    Do you know what it means?



  • @Vanguard:

    But dude… Anarchism is not the lack of laws, modern anarchism comes from the proletarian theory and is mostly about abolishing the class divided society and so, abolish work exploitation and shit like that. Have you EVER read anything from the proletarian theory?
    Do you know what it means?

    Ummmmmm you don’t know what anarchism means. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anarchism



  • @Huggles:

    Ummmmmm you don’t know what anarchism means. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anarchism

    Thats your sorce?

    Shit man… Dictionary… lol…

    Wanna understand what is anarchism? Guy Debord, Errico Malatesta, Mikhail Bakunin, Proudhon, Piotr Kropotkin. Guy Debord is the best to get the idea. I mean, is a complex theory that has changed a lot during modern history.



  • @Vanguard:

    Thats your sorce?

    Shit man… Dictionary… lol…

    Wanna understand what is anarchism? Guy Debord, Errico Malatesta, Mikhail Bakunin, Proudhon, Piotr Kropotkin. Guy Debord is the best to get the idea. I mean, is a complex theory that has changed a lot during modern history.

    Ik man, these dictionaries. It’s like, the only function they serve is to give definitions over what a particular concept is. Some of the guys you listed here are marxist socialists, not very good examples of anarchism……

    All of that complexity means absolutely nothing if it can’t function more effectively than Capitalism. You can’t limit the growth of private Industries, you should only limit how they achieve their goals so that they ultimately benefit the society rather than enslaving it.



  • @Huggles:

    Ik man, these dictionaries. It’s like, the only function they serve is to give definitions over what a particular concept is. Some of the guys you listed here are marxist socialists, not very good examples of anarchism……

    Lol, who in that list is marxist socialist? Really, I wanna know.

    Dictionaries are very userfull, but this is a complex subject and you are being really, REALLY reductionist.



  • Off Topic is the new debate club. Why did it have to get so serious?

    #Huggles4President2014.



  • @Vanguard:

    Lol, who in that list is marxist socialist? Really, I wanna know.

    Dictionaries are very userfull, but this is a complex subject and you are being really, REALLY reductionist.

    Do you even know what reductionism means? Because it seems like a plus to me.



  • ITT Huggles acts friendly in op to bait you into saying your ideology then he makes fun of you



  • @Karasu:

    ITT Huggles acts friendly in op to bait you into saying your ideology then he makes fun of you

    Liessssss

    /-10 for liessss/



  • @Huggles:

    Do you even know what reductionism means? Because it seems like a plus to me.

    What? I think I do, but english is not my first language so I might have used the wrong word, now Idk.

    Who from those names are marxist SOCIALISTS? Answer this, because I really think you’re talking big over a subject you do not understand (proletarian theory).



  • @Vanguard:

    What? I think I do, but english is not my first language so I might have used the wrong word, now Idk.

    Who from those names are marxist SOCIALISTS? Answer this, because I really think you’re talking big over a subject you do not understand (proletarian theory).

    Well there are most certainly some socialistic beliefs tied in with all of that, maybe not enough to label him as a socialist in paticular but guy debord was apart of certain organizations that can raise an eyebrow. Also, the proletarian theory is just wrong entirely and here’s why. Value is not objectively determined, and value is not zero-sum. Both of which he argues to be the case relentlessly. He believes that somehow the more a worker makes, the less he is getting because business owners must pay laborers less than their labor. Which is false, because in turn one can argue that this is simply not the case at all. Marx makes the straw man, that somehow markets values are fixed, and cannot change. Price is always determined based off of supply and demand, therefore one cannot argue direct exploitation is there, if the product value isn’t actually determined by the labor put into it.

    Resolution to your inexperience and lack of economical illiteracy: Drop unrealistic view points and become a progressive if you hate exploitation.



  • slavery failed, monarchism failed, feudalism failed, capitalism is what 250-300 years old?, it will fail…too bad we won’t be able to see how capitalism will sustain a population of 10,15,20 billions. Capitalists have the governments, they create their own rules, they control the state…so much power yet they can barely sustain 3rd world countries, unless they impose fascism and fund these ‘‘left-center’’ liberal parties to sabotage and murder revolutionaries. That’s how the world works outside the 1st world, Imperialism expanding their rule through fascism, they loot and leave the country in ruins.

    Fascism is when one greedy individual controls? that’s they teach in Princeton university?..Why fool their own lackeys when they could easily impose even more nationalism?

    Stop being an idiot and take your politics to this section before they ban you. They know you’re provoking


Log in to reply