Navigation

    • Games

    • About

    • Careers

    • Contact

    • Forums

    Torn Banner Forums
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Tags
    • Unsolved

    What Performance Will I Get?

    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare (PC/Mac/Linux)
    7
    14
    2012
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

      Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

      Processor: AMD A8-3520M 2.4 Ghz Quad Core
      RAM: 6 gb
      HD Space: 400 gb
      Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
      OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

      Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        acrh2 last edited by

        @Cosmic_Trashbin:

        Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

        Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
        RAM: 6 gb
        HD Space: 400 gb
        Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
        OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

        Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

        Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

          @acrh2:

          @Cosmic_Trashbin:

          Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

          Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
          RAM: 6 gb
          HD Space: 400 gb
          Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
          OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

          Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

          Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.

          You would consider a 2.4 Ghz Quad Core bad?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            acrh2 last edited by

            @Cosmic_Trashbin:

            @acrh2:

            @Cosmic_Trashbin:

            Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

            Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
            RAM: 6 gb
            HD Space: 400 gb
            Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
            OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

            Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

            Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.

            You would consider a 2.4 Ghz Quad Core bad?

            Well, yes. I’m running a 4.5GHz i7 3770k, which is about 5-10 times faster.
            I’m guesstimating that your fps will go down to low 20s in intense fights.

            How well do other unreal engine games run on your laptop?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Mkilbride last edited by

              A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

              BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

              Your GPU is also weak.

              I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

                @Mkilbride:

                A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

                BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

                Your GPU is also weak.

                I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.

                Well, I’m ok with running a game at low settings. Do you think that if I set everything to low but with a resolution of 1360x768 I would get at least 35 fps?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  Mkilbride last edited by

                  @Cosmic_Trashbin:

                  @Mkilbride:

                  A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

                  BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

                  Your GPU is also weak.

                  I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.

                  Well, I’m ok with running a game at low settings. Do you think that if I set everything to low but with a resolution of 1360x768 I would get at least 35 fps?

                  It’s possible. Game will look like ass though.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ChuckingIt
                    ChuckingIt last edited by

                    It will look like a minecraft mod. But if you don’t mind, then saddle up and ride!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

                      @Chuckdatass:

                      It will look like a minecraft mod. But if you don’t mind, then saddle up and ride!

                      Yup, I’m one of those people who care more about FPS than graphics. :D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

                        Well, I bought it…finally. I get 35 fps. Huzzah!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          Mephic last edited by

                          Well… The game on highest settings looks like a 2004 game anyway so… It is just very bad optimization. Every rig produced/invented after 2000 should be able to play it. It is more resource hog than Far Cry3 - gtx 560ti at 950/2150 mhz and core i5 3570k ivy 4,6 GHz - that gives nr stability. But where Are graphics? Setting everything to high and1920x1080 doesn’t make it better.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            Prof.Wubba last edited by

                            That’s a difficult question, as I know some people with very powerful PCs that get awful performance.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Cosmic_Trashbin last edited by

                              @Prof.Wubba:

                              That’s a difficult question, as I know some people with very powerful PCs that get awful performance.

                              Yeah, my laptop isn’t that great, but I bought the game yesterday, and I get like 35-40 fps on medium. Huzzah!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • venomblade
                                venomblade last edited by

                                @Cosmic_Trashbin:

                                Well, I bought it…finally. I get 35 fps. Huzzah!

                                I wish I could be content with 35 fps lol. I wouldn’t need such powerful hardware then.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post