What Performance Will I Get?



  • Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

    Processor: AMD A8-3520M 2.4 Ghz Quad Core
    RAM: 6 gb
    HD Space: 400 gb
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
    OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

    Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)



  • @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

    Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
    RAM: 6 gb
    HD Space: 400 gb
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
    OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

    Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

    Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.



  • @acrh2:

    @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

    Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
    RAM: 6 gb
    HD Space: 400 gb
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
    OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

    Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

    Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.

    You would consider a 2.4 Ghz Quad Core bad?



  • @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    @acrh2:

    @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    Yeah, I posted a topic a while back asking whether my laptop could run this game or not. The answer was yes, but can anyone guess what performance I would get running the game at high settings? Medium settings? Low settings?

    Processor: AMD A8-3520M 1.6/2.4 Ghz Quad Core
    RAM: 6 gb
    HD Space: 400 gb
    Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6620G Integrated/AMD Radeon HD 7690M Dedicated (for crossfire)
    OS: Win. 7 Home Premium 64 bit

    Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. :)

    Bad. Your cpu is your bottleneck and will result in framerate issues on 32-man servers.

    You would consider a 2.4 Ghz Quad Core bad?

    Well, yes. I’m running a 4.5GHz i7 3770k, which is about 5-10 times faster.
    I’m guesstimating that your fps will go down to low 20s in intense fights.

    How well do other unreal engine games run on your laptop?



  • A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

    BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

    Your GPU is also weak.

    I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.



  • @Mkilbride:

    A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

    BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

    Your GPU is also weak.

    I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.

    Well, I’m ok with running a game at low settings. Do you think that if I set everything to low but with a resolution of 1360x768 I would get at least 35 fps?



  • @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    @Mkilbride:

    A Quad Core @ 2.4GHZ is good.

    BUT, a AMD Quad Core? No…especially not a APU series.

    Your GPU is also weak.

    I’d say low / medium at a very low resolution for 30-40FPS.

    Well, I’m ok with running a game at low settings. Do you think that if I set everything to low but with a resolution of 1360x768 I would get at least 35 fps?

    It’s possible. Game will look like ass though.



  • It will look like a minecraft mod. But if you don’t mind, then saddle up and ride!



  • @Chuckdatass:

    It will look like a minecraft mod. But if you don’t mind, then saddle up and ride!

    Yup, I’m one of those people who care more about FPS than graphics. :D



  • Well, I bought it…finally. I get 35 fps. Huzzah!



  • Well… The game on highest settings looks like a 2004 game anyway so… It is just very bad optimization. Every rig produced/invented after 2000 should be able to play it. It is more resource hog than Far Cry3 - gtx 560ti at 950/2150 mhz and core i5 3570k ivy 4,6 GHz - that gives nr stability. But where Are graphics? Setting everything to high and1920x1080 doesn’t make it better.



  • That’s a difficult question, as I know some people with very powerful PCs that get awful performance.



  • @Prof.Wubba:

    That’s a difficult question, as I know some people with very powerful PCs that get awful performance.

    Yeah, my laptop isn’t that great, but I bought the game yesterday, and I get like 35-40 fps on medium. Huzzah!



  • @Cosmic_Trashbin:

    Well, I bought it…finally. I get 35 fps. Huzzah!

    I wish I could be content with 35 fps lol. I wouldn’t need such powerful hardware then.


Log in to reply