i didnt used to have this problem but now i also get black screen,this i fix by minimizing the game for a few seconds(10% of the time this makes the game stop responding tho)
my drivers are up to date.
i am also very annoyed about the servers showing me 20/30 people and i join to often find 3-5people inside.
finaly some other people who expierenced this.weirdly i have only experienced this on maa and when u quickly swap to 3th person view everything looks normal.if its exclusive to shields i would think its exclusive to the buckler(or whatever the small shield is called) or i have been very lucky to never experience this on a knight with a shield
for projectiles this is a must,2archers should be able to headshot each other.
for melee im not sure this is a great idea.
The sooner you assume it and get out of the closet the better.
i think u mean accept
if u want to insult people at least try to make sense…freaking tard
As a maul player this is something I rely on. Feints are not reliable as its too slow and dodging attacks isn’t always easy.
i rely on this when an archer whoops out his knife and starts facehugging me,sure i can try to backpaddle and block his attacks,but with his fast weapon vs my slow weapon thats a pain,its much easier to just wait till he hit u and then swing,if u connect u will do way more damage then he did and if he is able to block u usualy have some time to distance urself giving u the advantage once more.
i truly dont think the archer should stand any chance in a straight up melee fight vs the other classes i see melee for archers more as a finishing tool,should the knight have survived ur arrow and closed ground with u then u can maybe get that killing stab in.living in prolonged combat with a small weapon vs a knight with a big weapon should be only maa material as he gets the dodge and movementspeed to make up for his lack of other melee skills.
wotr has this and it brings with it alot of balance problems,u will quickly see the same perks over and over again.
i have noticed this aswell,ive been killed by people who didnt even see me or even tried to swing in my direction(usualy being carefull can prevent this,but it happens)
i do agree that a weapon should only do little damage on the beginning and possibly the very end of a swing as momentum hasent been build up/is fading
my problem with the slash and ive posted about this in another thread is that u cant choose direction(i think there should maybe be 2slash buttons,tho we alrdy have alot of buttons with 3directional attack each having a button)because now standing with ur right side to a wall or an object it means u cant do a swing attack,i think this is rather silly and would like to be able to start my swing from both left and right(maybe this is possible and i am just blind?)
Thank you very much, that is an excellent source and was trying to find a better one. Some key notes from it
“Gritty yet realistic world”
“Seeks to capture the experience of truly being on a medieval battlefield”
This is exactly my point, by adding female characters it distorts that semi realistic sense that they are going for. And for you guys who don’t know, the original argument was held a few days ago. I just wanted to post this because I was concerned that the devs were getting pressured into it by female players. I say stay on course devs!
since u agreed warband is a good example i can say i never felt that female chars broke the immersion for me.when that siegetower hit the hole in that castlewall even if there were a bunch of female chars with me or waiting for me i felt like i was in a medieval battle.in a way more so then in this game,but in other ways less.
but ofcourse if many people feel strongly about this adding them seems like a bad idea.
Well, you read something, somewhere, but the OP quotes a developer of this game, saying this game wants to be semi-historical. So why still try to bash the historical argument?
And yes, there have been women on the battlefields. In civial wars, in conflicts where no regular armies met and so on.
In Chiv, Mason´s army fights Agahta´s army.
Taking a look at the classes, weapons and armor, they defnately are a regular army, not some random bandits, mercenaries or something like that.
And women did not fight in regular armies. I hope no one mentions Joan of Arc… She never really fought. She was “just” a symbol.
So, please tell me, out of curiosity, where and when was that not uncommon?
Oh and as a side note: I never liked female warriors in M&B. ;)
WHAT IS CHIVALRY: MEDIEVAL WARFARE?
CHIVALRY: Medieval Warfare is a first-person slasher with a focus on multi-player. Featuring competitive online combat that seeks to capture the experience of truly being on a medieval battlefield. We’ve drawn our inspiration from the intensity and epicness of swordfighting movies such as 300, Gladiator and Braveheart and we want to bring that experience to the hands of a gamer.
The game is skill-based and controls like a FPS, but instead of guns and grenades, players are given swords, shields, maces, battleaxes and longbows. Set in a fictional yet gritty and realistic world, players will fight in fast paced online battles besieging castles, raiding medieval villages and fighting for glory in the arena with up to 32 players.
Good by to any “fantasy” arguments, welcome to semi-historical, realistic setting arguments :D
since i couldnt remember where i read it i was upfront about that it is just smthn i read and even clarified that IF what i stated above is true and didnt claim it to be true.
many “armies” of what would be called barbarians would have women in their ranks especialy when defending their homeland(many woman prefered to die with a fighting chance then wait at home to be looted,killed or enslaved and who knows what else if the enemy army won)
i will agree that it was alot less common on the medieval battlefield,but not rly that uncommon through history.
when picking epic swordfighting movies like 300,gladiator and braveheart i think u/they rly hit the nail on the head cause those movies were alot of fantasy and very semi historical(not bad movies)
also im not rly one to argue hard in favor off adding women(i think there are alot more things that the game needs,this should just be a sidethought if anything)im just suprised to see this topic…tho not rly since a few weeks ago there was similar thread on wotr forums :p